Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Washita State Bank vs Great Plains National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Washita State Bank | Great Plains National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 53 | 62 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 96 (stronger) | 44 |
| Loan quality | 0 | 56 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 28 | 92 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 77 (stronger) | 55 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 71 | 78 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 12th | 27th |
| Total assets | $44.3M | $1.9B |
| Deposits / shares | $35.7M | $1.7B |
| Capital ratio | 14.60% (stronger) | 9.42% |
| Problem loans | 3.34% | 1.33% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.38% |
| Return on assets | 0.20% | 1.81% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 83.4% (stronger) | 95.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 15.2% (stronger) | 23.8% |
| Offices | 1 | 23 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Great Plains National Bank has the higher TellerScore (62 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Washita State Bank leads on 4 and Great Plains National Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.