Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Washita Valley Bank vs Walters Bank and Trust Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Washita Valley Bank | Walters Bank and Trust Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 52 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 73 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 64 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 88 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 43 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 11th | 99th |
| Total assets | $68.8M | $70.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $60.0M | $56.5M |
| Capital ratio | 12.27% | 20.03% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 8.23% | 0.06% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 3.04% | 0.10% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.11% | 2.33% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 50.2% (stronger) | 60.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 26.1% | 11.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 12.8% |
Walters Bank and Trust Company has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Washita Valley Bank leads on 1 and Walters Bank and Trust Company on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.