Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Wells River Savings Bank vs Bank of New Hampshire
Metric by metric
| Measure | Wells River Savings Bank | Bank of New Hampshire |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 67 | 72 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 58 | 71 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 79 | 79 |
| Earnings | 45 | 60 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 81 (stronger) | 64 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 | 92 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 34th | 66th |
| Total assets | $266.9M | $2.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $234.6M | $2.4B |
| Capital ratio | 10.75% | 12.08% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.63% (stronger) | 0.63% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.62% | 0.99% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 78.9% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 6.6% (stronger) | 19.0% |
| Offices | 6 | 21 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.0% |
Bank of New Hampshire has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Wells River Savings Bank leads on 3 and Bank of New Hampshire on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.