TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Williamsville Federal Credit Union vs Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Williamsville Federal Credit Union

Amherst, New York · Under $100 million in assets

70of 100
Strong

Credit union

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Blasdell, New York · $100 million – $1 billion

96of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureWilliamsville Federal Credit UnionGreater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7096 (stronger)
Capital cushion68100 (stronger)
Loan quality9596 (stronger)
Earnings485 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99100 (stronger)
Peer percentile40th99th
Total assets$11.1M$168.4M
Deposits / shares$9.8M$127.8M
Capital ratio11.84%23.92% (stronger)
Problem loans0.15%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.03%
Return on assets-0.39%1.62% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits51.5% (stronger)55.9%
Uninsured deposits1.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices23
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—4.9%

Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (96 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Williamsville Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Greater Woodlawn Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions