TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

2 Rivers Area Credit Union vs Kaskaskia Valley Community Credit Union

Credit union

2 Rivers Area Credit Union

Kankakee, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Kaskaskia Valley Community Credit Union

Centralia, Illinois · Under $100 million in assets

49of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

Measure2 Rivers Area Credit UnionKaskaskia Valley Community Credit Union
TellerScore66 (stronger)49
Capital cushion57 (stronger)29
Loan quality74 (stronger)62
Earnings34 (stronger)13
Funding & liquidity96 (stronger)94
Problem-loan coverage91 (stronger)83
Peer percentile32nd8th
Total assets$27.7M$29.4M
Deposits / shares$25.1M$26.6M
Capital ratio10.68% (stronger)7.91%
Problem loans0.78% (stronger)1.13%
Net charge-offs0.27% (stronger)0.51%
Return on assets0.35% (stronger)-0.18%
Loans ÷ deposits64.7% (stronger)66.5%
Uninsured deposits6.4%0.0% (stronger)
Offices13
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

2 Rivers Area Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (66 vs 49). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), 2 Rivers Area Credit Union leads on 6 and Kaskaskia Valley Community Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions