TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Afl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union vs Lee Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Afl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Lee Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureAfl Cio Employees Federal Credit UnionLee Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6199 (stronger)
Capital cushion74100 (stronger)
Loan quality71100 (stronger)
Earnings895 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity71100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage89100 (stronger)
Peer percentile23rd99th
Total assets$48.4M$5.5M
Deposits / shares$42.6M$2.7M
Capital ratio12.45%50.68% (stronger)
Problem loans0.86%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.56%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.31%1.86% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits88.8%44.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits6.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)16.7%—

Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Afl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions