Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Alamosa State Bank vs NBH Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Alamosa State Bank | NBH Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 79 (stronger) | 53 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 80 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 64 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 58th |
| Total assets | $340.3M | $12.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $297.8M | $10.6B |
| Capital ratio | 12.85% (stronger) | 10.27% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.60% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.32% |
| Return on assets | 2.39% (stronger) | 1.09% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 59.4% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 46.3% | 30.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 91 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 16.8% |
Alamosa State Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Alamosa State Bank leads on 6 and NBH Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.