Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Alpine Bank vs Timberline Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Alpine Bank | Timberline Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 75 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 60 (stronger) | 44 |
| Loan quality | 90 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 72 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 59 (stronger) | 49 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 61st |
| Total assets | $6.7B | $832.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $5.9B | $699.6M |
| Capital ratio | 11.02% (stronger) | 9.38% |
| Problem loans | 0.31% | 0.06% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.29% | 2.12% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 75.0% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 38.5% | 32.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 40 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 13.2% | — |
Timberline Bank has the higher TellerScore (75 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Alpine Bank leads on 2 and Timberline Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.