Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Altamaha Bank & Trust Company vs Classic City Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Altamaha Bank & Trust Company | Classic City Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 60 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 89 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 69 (stronger) | 48 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 77th |
| Total assets | $334.1M | $314.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $303.8M | $277.8M |
| Capital ratio | 10.19% | 11.04% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.32% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.87% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.55% | 2.11% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 80.4% | 72.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.9% (stronger) | 50.7% |
| Offices | 4 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Classic City Bank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Altamaha Bank & Trust Company leads on 1 and Classic City Bank on 6. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.