Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Anna-Jonesboro National Bank vs River to River Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Anna-Jonesboro National Bank | River to River Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 65 | 97 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 96 | 97 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 92 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 97 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 80 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 29th | 98th |
| Total assets | $234.2M | $29.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $203.9M | $25.3M |
| Capital ratio | 14.57% | 14.65% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 3.00% | 0.23% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.12% |
| Return on assets | 1.20% | 2.25% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 50.8% (stronger) | 59.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.0% | 0.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
River to River Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Anna-Jonesboro National Bank leads on 2 and River to River Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.