Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Mt. Rainier Credit Union
Bank
Armed Forces Bank, National Association
Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion
Metric by metric
| Measure | Armed Forces Bank, National Association | Mt. Rainier Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 (stronger) | 74 |
| Capital cushion | 89 (stronger) | 84 |
| Loan quality | 60 | 76 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 88 (stronger) | 25 |
| Funding & liquidity | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 91 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 49th |
| Total assets | $1.4B | $26.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $22.8M |
| Capital ratio | 13.92% (stronger) | 13.36% |
| Problem loans | 1.21% | 0.72% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.39% | 0.12% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.70% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 59.3% | 31.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 17.1% | 4.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 14 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 20.4% | — |
Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 3 and Mt. Rainier Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.