TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Olympia Credit Union

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

Olympia Credit Union

Olympia, Washington · Under $100 million in assets

59of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationOlympia Credit Union
TellerScore83 (stronger)59
Capital cushion89 (stronger)32
Loan quality6087 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)35
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)73
Problem-loan coverage9192 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th20th
Total assets$1.4B$56.3M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$51.9M
Capital ratio13.92% (stronger)8.18%
Problem loans1.21%0.39% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39% (stronger)0.46%
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)0.37%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)86.9%
Uninsured deposits17.1%3.6% (stronger)
Offices142
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Armed Forces Bank, National Association has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 5 and Olympia Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions