TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armed Forces Bank, National Association vs Pikes Peak National Bank

Bank

Armed Forces Bank, National Association

Fort Leavenworth, Kansas · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Bank

Pikes Peak National Bank

Colorado Springs, Colorado · $100 million – $1 billion

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureArmed Forces Bank, National AssociationPikes Peak National Bank
TellerScore8385 (stronger)
Capital cushion89100 (stronger)
Loan quality60100 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity98 (stronger)74
Problem-loan coverage91100 (stronger)
Peer percentile94th88th
Total assets$1.4B$110.8M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$93.1M
Capital ratio13.92%15.56% (stronger)
Problem loans1.21%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.39%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.70% (stronger)0.59%
Loans ÷ deposits59.3% (stronger)78.4%
Uninsured deposits17.1% (stronger)22.4%
Offices143
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.4%—

Pikes Peak National Bank has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armed Forces Bank, National Association leads on 3 and Pikes Peak National Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions