TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Armstrong Associates Federal Credit Union vs Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Armstrong Associates Federal Credit Union

Ford City, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

75of 100
Strong

Credit union

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union

Camp Hill, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

90of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureArmstrong Associates Federal Credit UnionSusquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7590 (stronger)
Capital cushion7373
Loan quality8198 (stronger)
Earnings4194 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage9699 (stronger)
Peer percentile52nd89th
Total assets$82.3M$86.9M
Deposits / shares$71.3M$76.4M
Capital ratio12.32% (stronger)12.29%
Problem loans0.57%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.48%0.07% (stronger)
Return on assets0.52%1.84% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits52.9% (stronger)58.7%
Uninsured deposits2.9%1.7% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)14.6%—

Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armstrong Associates Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Susquehanna Valley Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions