Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Armstrong Bank vs FNB Coweta
Metric by metric
| Measure | Armstrong Bank | FNB Coweta |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 54 | 62 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 75 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 | 83 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 74th | 90th |
| Total assets | $2.8B | $127.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.6B | $115.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.42% | 11.17% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.25% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.15% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.37% | 2.16% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.3% | 58.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.5% (stronger) | 30.4% |
| Offices | 30 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 9.7% | — |
FNB Coweta has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Armstrong Bank leads on 1 and FNB Coweta on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.