TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union vs Kimberly Clark Credit Union

Credit union

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Kimberly Clark Credit Union

Memphis, Tennessee · $100 million – $1 billion

75of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureAsbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit UnionKimberly Clark Credit Union
TellerScore100 (stronger)75
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)56
Earnings100 (stronger)41
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)87
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)93
Peer percentile100th66th
Total assets$4.1M$144.7M
Deposits / shares$3.5M$111.5M
Capital ratio15.40%22.34% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.33%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.70%
Return on assets2.26% (stronger)0.52%
Loans ÷ deposits21.0% (stronger)73.2%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)10.3%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Kimberly Clark Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions