TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union vs M.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Credit union

M.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureAsbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit UnionM.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union
TellerScore100 (stronger)74
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)0
Earnings100100
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)90
Peer percentile100th49th
Total assets$4.1M$167K
Deposits / shares$3.5M$130K
Capital ratio15.40%22.34% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)8.20%
Net charge-offs0.00%0.00%
Return on assets2.26% (stronger)2.14%
Loans ÷ deposits21.0%19.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 74). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and M.A.B.C. Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions