Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Ascendia Bank vs United Roosevelt Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Ascendia Bank | United Roosevelt Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 43 (stronger) | 41 |
| Loan quality | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 30 | 38 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 60 (stronger) | 18 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 22nd | 14th |
| Total assets | $395.3M | $381.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $318.8M | $303.5M |
| Capital ratio | 9.29% (stronger) | 9.11% |
| Problem loans | 0.13% | 0.03% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.03% |
| Return on assets | 0.24% | 0.45% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 100.3% (stronger) | 104.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 8.7% (stronger) | 49.0% |
| Offices | 5 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Ascendia Bank has the higher TellerScore (62 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ascendia Bank leads on 5 and United Roosevelt Savings Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.