Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Auburn Banking Company vs Edmonton State Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Auburn Banking Company | Edmonton State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 65 | 82 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 33 | 65 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 78 | 89 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 86 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 | 68 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 87 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 29th | 93rd |
| Total assets | $164.3M | $1.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $149.8M | $1.0B |
| Capital ratio | 8.26% | 11.47% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.65% | 0.32% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.65% | 2.44% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 83.4% (stronger) | 91.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 24.1% | 15.6% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 18 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 15.9% |
Edmonton State Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Auburn Banking Company leads on 1 and Edmonton State Bank on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.