Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
AuburnBank vs Four Seasons Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | AuburnBank | Four Seasons Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 58 |
| Capital cushion | 57 (stronger) | 36 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 49 |
| Earnings | 55 | 63 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 74 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 79 |
| Peer percentile | 74th | 16th |
| Total assets | $1.1B | $103.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $990.5M | $93.2M |
| Capital ratio | 10.65% (stronger) | 8.64% |
| Problem loans | 0.01% (stronger) | 1.53% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.13% (stronger) | 1.39% |
| Return on assets | 0.88% | 1.08% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 57.9% (stronger) | 64.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 38.4% | 9.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.3% | — |
AuburnBank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), AuburnBank leads on 5 and Four Seasons Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.