TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

AuburnBank vs Kinetic Federal Credit Union

Bank

AuburnBank

Auburn, Alabama · $1 billion – $10 billion

74of 100
Strong

Credit union

Kinetic Federal Credit Union

Columbus, Georgia · $100 million – $1 billion

66of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureAuburnBankKinetic Federal Credit Union
TellerScore74 (stronger)66
Capital cushion5791 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)48
Earnings55 (stronger)32
Funding & liquidity7482 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)84
Peer percentile74th37th
Total assets$1.1B$664.6M
Deposits / shares$990.5M$569.5M
Capital ratio10.65%14.08% (stronger)
Problem loans0.01% (stronger)1.55%
Net charge-offs0.13% (stronger)1.14%
Return on assets0.88% (stronger)0.31%
Loans ÷ deposits57.9% (stronger)78.3%
Uninsured deposits38.4%7.5% (stronger)
Offices76
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.3%35.5%

AuburnBank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), AuburnBank leads on 5 and Kinetic Federal Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions