Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Badger Bank vs The Park Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Badger Bank | The Park Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 74 (stronger) | 57 |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 92 |
| Earnings | 75 (stronger) | 48 |
| Funding & liquidity | 70 (stronger) | 31 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 82nd | 33rd |
| Total assets | $206.0M | $1.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $164.6M | $1.2B |
| Capital ratio | 12.40% (stronger) | 10.74% |
| Problem loans | 0.07% (stronger) | 0.24% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.37% (stronger) | 0.71% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.4% (stronger) | 103.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 20.1% (stronger) | 38.5% |
| Offices | 4 | 10 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.1% | 9.1% |
Badger Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Badger Bank leads on 7 and The Park Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.