TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Baker Hughes Federal Credit Union vs I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Baker Hughes Federal Credit Union

Houston, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

66of 100
Moderate

Credit union

I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union

Pasadena, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

78of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBaker Hughes Federal Credit UnionI.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore6678 (stronger)
Capital cushion7889 (stronger)
Loan quality7292 (stronger)
Earnings045 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)67
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)97
Peer percentile32nd59th
Total assets$11.2M$11.5M
Deposits / shares$9.8M$9.8M
Capital ratio12.77%13.85% (stronger)
Problem loans0.84%0.23% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.53%-0.09% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.77%0.62% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits13.5% (stronger)93.7%
Uninsured deposits0.7% (stronger)0.9%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Baker Hughes Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions