Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Banesco USA vs Nave Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Banesco USA | Nave Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 (stronger) | 69 |
| Capital cushion | 65 | 88 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 84 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 79 (stronger) | 1 |
| Funding & liquidity | 44 | 47 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 40th |
| Total assets | $6.0B | $555.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $5.2B | $431.9M |
| Capital ratio | 11.46% | 13.84% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.49% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.10% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.47% (stronger) | -0.49% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.0% | 63.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 51.6% (stronger) | 85.3% |
| Offices | 6 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Banesco USA has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Banesco USA leads on 3 and Nave Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.