TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Bank Fund Staff Federal Credit Union vs Idb Global Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Bank Fund Staff Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $1 billion – $10 billion

81of 100
Strong

Credit union

Idb Global Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

74of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBank Fund Staff Federal Credit UnionIdb Global Federal Credit Union
TellerScore81 (stronger)74
Capital cushion86 (stronger)73
Loan quality8696 (stronger)
Earnings61 (stronger)38
Funding & liquidity82 (stronger)71
Problem-loan coverage9699 (stronger)
Peer percentile89th63rd
Total assets$7.1B$842.4M
Deposits / shares$6.1B$713.6M
Capital ratio13.64% (stronger)12.34%
Problem loans0.42%0.13% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.09%0.04% (stronger)
Return on assets1.02% (stronger)0.45%
Loans ÷ deposits62.8% (stronger)78.4%
Uninsured deposits29.0%24.5% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)12.2%0.9%

Bank Fund Staff Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank Fund Staff Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Idb Global Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions