TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Bank Hapoalim B.M. vs Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Bank

Bank Hapoalim B.M.

New York, New York · $10 billion – $100 billion

24of 100
Low

Credit union

Wakefern Federal Credit Union

Elizabeth, New Jersey · Under $100 million in assets

99of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBank Hapoalim B.M.Wakefern Federal Credit Union
TellerScore2499 (stronger)
Capital cushion0100 (stronger)
Loan quality3696 (stronger)
Earnings20100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity5599 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage—100
Peer percentile0th99th
Total assets$11.0B$12.0M
Deposits / shares$8.2B$9.1M
Capital ratio0.00%24.31% (stronger)
Problem loans1.92%0.13% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.09%
Return on assets0.00%2.03% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits104.9%42.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits6.9% (stronger)16.4%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Wakefern Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 24). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank Hapoalim B.M. leads on 2 and Wakefern Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions