TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Bank of Bartlett vs Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Bank

Bank of Bartlett

Bartlett, Tennessee · $100 million – $1 billion

54of 100
Below average

Credit union

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBank of BartlettAsbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore54100 (stronger)
Capital cushion35100 (stronger)
Loan quality67100 (stronger)
Earnings46100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity71100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage70100 (stronger)
Peer percentile10th100th
Total assets$551.8M$4.1M
Deposits / shares$466.1M$3.5M
Capital ratio8.51%15.40% (stronger)
Problem loans0.98%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.04%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets0.65%2.26% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits81.8%21.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits21.5%0.0% (stronger)
Offices72
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)40.8%—

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Bartlett leads on 0 and Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions