Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Columbia vs Abound Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Columbia | Abound Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 43 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 94 (stronger) | 73 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 61 |
| Funding & liquidity | 69 | 73 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 64th | 89th |
| Total assets | $231.1M | $2.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $209.2M | $2.3B |
| Capital ratio | 9.31% | 15.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.19% (stronger) | 0.81% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.62% |
| Return on assets | 2.27% (stronger) | 1.03% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 87.5% | 87.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.1% | 12.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 10 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 18.6% |
Abound Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Columbia leads on 3 and Abound Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.