Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Gleason vs Centennial Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Gleason | Centennial Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 (stronger) | 59 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 48 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 58 |
| Earnings | 68 (stronger) | 59 |
| Funding & liquidity | 88 (stronger) | 69 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 83 |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 19th |
| Total assets | $138.5M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $113.2M | $940.1M |
| Capital ratio | 20.86% (stronger) | 9.82% |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 1.26% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.19% |
| Return on assets | 1.19% (stronger) | 0.98% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 71.1% (stronger) | 78.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.0% (stronger) | 26.2% |
| Offices | 2 | 14 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 6.7% |
Bank of Gleason has the higher TellerScore (90 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Gleason leads on 7 and Centennial Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.