Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Hazlehurst vs Fnb South
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Hazlehurst | Fnb South |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 90 | 95 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 96 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 77 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 84 (stronger) | 65 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 95th | 99th |
| Total assets | $134.2M | $734.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $117.9M | $610.4M |
| Capital ratio | 14.56% | 16.24% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.68% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.29% | -1.45% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.19% | 2.64% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 46.9% (stronger) | 78.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 29.8% | 29.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Fnb South has the higher TellerScore (95 vs 90). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Hazlehurst leads on 1 and Fnb South on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.