Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Hindman vs Lewisburg Banking Company
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Hindman | Lewisburg Banking Company |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 72 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 42 (stronger) | 40 |
| Loan quality | 70 | 84 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 39 | 94 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 73 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 92 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 22nd | 50th |
| Total assets | $259.7M | $246.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $211.4M | $210.1M |
| Capital ratio | 9.19% (stronger) | 9.05% |
| Problem loans | 0.91% | 0.48% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.14% | -0.07% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.48% | 1.85% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 55.7% (stronger) | 76.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.9% (stronger) | 24.0% |
| Offices | 2 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Lewisburg Banking Company has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Hindman leads on 3 and Lewisburg Banking Company on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.