Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Hindman vs Peoples Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Hindman | Peoples Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 62 | 67 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 42 | 47 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 70 | 80 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 39 | 72 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 58 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 94 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 22nd | 44th |
| Total assets | $259.7M | $9.5B |
| Deposits / shares | $211.4M | $7.5B |
| Capital ratio | 9.19% | 9.70% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.91% | 0.60% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.35% |
| Return on assets | 0.48% | 1.31% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 55.7% (stronger) | 89.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.9% (stronger) | 26.4% |
| Offices | 2 | 128 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 24.1% |
Peoples Bank has the higher TellerScore (67 vs 62). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Hindman leads on 3 and Peoples Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.