Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Holyrood vs Argentine Federal Savings
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Holyrood | Argentine Federal Savings |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 (stronger) | 51 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 67 |
| Loan quality | 3 | 30 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 72 (stronger) | 26 |
| Funding & liquidity | 88 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 75 | 76 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 28th | 10th |
| Total assets | $69.8M | $70.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $58.9M | $56.0M |
| Capital ratio | 16.68% (stronger) | 11.71% |
| Problem loans | 2.92% | 2.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.72% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.29% (stronger) | 0.15% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 68.0% (stronger) | 85.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.0% (stronger) | 19.5% |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Bank of Holyrood has the higher TellerScore (66 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Holyrood leads on 5 and Argentine Federal Savings on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.