Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Kampsville vs Royal Banks of Missouri
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Kampsville | Royal Banks of Missouri |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 91 (stronger) | 70 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 59 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Earnings | 57 | 62 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 59 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Peer percentile | 96th | 58th |
| Total assets | $134.1M | $1.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $110.7M | $891.6M |
| Capital ratio | 17.41% (stronger) | 10.93% |
| Problem loans | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.16% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.93% | 1.05% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 42.3% (stronger) | 90.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 7.5% (stronger) | 25.2% |
| Offices | 4 | 16 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 27.6% | — |
Bank of Kampsville has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Kampsville leads on 5 and Royal Banks of Missouri on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.