TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Bank of Montana vs St. Pats Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Bank of Montana

Missoula, Montana · $100 million – $1 billion

75of 100
Strong

Credit union

St. Pats Employees Federal Credit Union

Missoula, Montana · Under $100 million in assets

77of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBank of MontanaSt. Pats Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7577 (stronger)
Capital cushion3978 (stronger)
Loan quality100 (stronger)67
Earnings100 (stronger)62
Funding & liquidity52100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)95
Peer percentile61st57th
Total assets$308.6M$5.4M
Deposits / shares$278.9M$4.7M
Capital ratio8.89%12.83% (stronger)
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.00%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.20%
Return on assets3.26% (stronger)1.04%
Loans ÷ deposits27.2% (stronger)37.7%
Uninsured deposits58.3%3.2% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

St. Pats Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Montana leads on 4 and St. Pats Employees Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions