Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of New England vs Walden Mutual Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of New England | Walden Mutual Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 (stronger) | 35 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 42 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 21 |
| Funding & liquidity | 43 | 87 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 64 (stronger) | 52 |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 1st |
| Total assets | $1.8B | $192.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.5B | $173.5M |
| Capital ratio | 16.78% (stronger) | 9.33% |
| Problem loans | 1.73% (stronger) | 3.50% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% (stronger) | 0.17% |
| Return on assets | 2.17% (stronger) | 0.02% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 103.7% | 72.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.4% | 15.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 9 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Bank of New England has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 35). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of New England leads on 5 and Walden Mutual Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.