Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of New Hampshire vs Sugar River Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of New Hampshire | Sugar River Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 71 | 91 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 79 | 89 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 60 (stronger) | 46 |
| Funding & liquidity | 64 | 77 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 96 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 66th | 77th |
| Total assets | $2.8B | $424.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.4B | $364.3M |
| Capital ratio | 12.08% | 14.13% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.63% | 0.33% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.03% |
| Return on assets | 0.99% (stronger) | 0.64% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 91.8% | 80.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.0% | 18.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 21 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Sugar River Bank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of New Hampshire leads on 2 and Sugar River Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.