TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Bank of Tennessee vs Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Bank

Bank of Tennessee

Kingsport, Tennessee · $1 billion – $10 billion

67of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureBank of TennesseeGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union
TellerScore6786 (stronger)
Capital cushion46100 (stronger)
Loan quality85100 (stronger)
Earnings92 (stronger)68
Funding & liquidity2750 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage92100 (stronger)
Peer percentile44th80th
Total assets$2.3B$1.8M
Deposits / shares$1.8B$848K
Capital ratio9.63%52.15% (stronger)
Problem loans0.45%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.01%-0.32% (stronger)
Return on assets1.79% (stronger)1.21%
Loans ÷ deposits100.0% (stronger)122.2%
Uninsured deposits45.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices211
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)16.3%—

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Tennessee leads on 2 and Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions