TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Bank of the Sierra vs Valley Agricultural Federal Credit Union

Bank

Bank of the Sierra

Porterville, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

77of 100
Strong

Credit union

Valley Agricultural Federal Credit Union

Santa Paula, California · Under $100 million in assets

57of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureBank of the SierraValley Agricultural Federal Credit Union
TellerScore77 (stronger)57
Capital cushion72 (stronger)66
Loan quality86 (stronger)33
Earnings73 (stronger)28
Funding & liquidity63100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage96 (stronger)85
Peer percentile83rd17th
Total assets$3.7B$4.6M
Deposits / shares$2.9B$4.1M
Capital ratio12.25% (stronger)11.55%
Problem loans0.43% (stronger)2.01%
Net charge-offs0.02% (stronger)0.87%
Return on assets1.33% (stronger)0.21%
Loans ÷ deposits82.9%49.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits27.9%0.6% (stronger)
Offices341
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Bank of the Sierra has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of the Sierra leads on 5 and Valley Agricultural Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions