Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank of Vici vs Cowboy Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank of Vici | Cowboy Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 30 | 84 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 52 | 77 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 0 | 84 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 99 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 0 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 1st | 86th |
| Total assets | $28.9M | $350.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $26.8M | $297.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.23% | 12.72% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 12.31% | 0.49% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.32% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -0.87% | 2.62% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 50.3% (stronger) | 85.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 15.7% (stronger) | 19.5% |
| Offices | 1 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 1.8% |
Cowboy Bank has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 30). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank of Vici leads on 2 and Cowboy Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.