Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank OZK vs Coosa Valley Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank OZK | Coosa Valley Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 (stronger) | 65 |
| Capital cushion | 90 (stronger) | 45 |
| Loan quality | 69 | 80 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 84 (stronger) | 63 |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 71 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 83 | 87 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 34th |
| Total assets | $41.7B | $765.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $34.0B | $678.1M |
| Capital ratio | 13.96% (stronger) | 9.53% |
| Problem loans | 0.92% | 0.61% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.62% | 0.52% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.60% (stronger) | 1.08% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.4% | 89.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.5% | 5.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 255 | 12 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 153 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.5 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 37.8% | 0.0% |
Bank OZK has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank OZK leads on 3 and Coosa Valley Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.