Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bank OZK vs Oteen V. A. Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Oteen V. A. Federal Credit Union
Asheville, North Carolina · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bank OZK | Oteen V. A. Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 91 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 90 (stronger) | 80 |
| Loan quality | 69 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 84 | 94 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 83 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 90th |
| Total assets | $41.7B | $34.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $34.0B | $29.8M |
| Capital ratio | 13.96% (stronger) | 13.04% |
| Problem loans | 0.92% | 0.15% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.62% | 0.16% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.60% | 1.84% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.4% | 49.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.5% | 1.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 255 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 153 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 4.5 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 37.8% | — |
Oteen V. A. Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bank OZK leads on 1 and Oteen V. A. Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.