Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Blue Grass Savings Bank vs Blackhawk Bank & Trust
Metric by metric
| Measure | Blue Grass Savings Bank | Blackhawk Bank & Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 76 |
| Capital cushion | 93 (stronger) | 55 |
| Loan quality | 89 | 97 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 72 | 82 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 98 (stronger) | 60 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 80th |
| Total assets | $225.5M | $2.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $185.6M | $1.6B |
| Capital ratio | 14.30% (stronger) | 10.54% |
| Problem loans | 0.34% | 0.09% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.11% |
| Return on assets | 1.31% | 1.55% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.8% (stronger) | 78.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 12.6% (stronger) | 34.2% |
| Offices | 2 | 18 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | 12.4% |
Blue Grass Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Blue Grass Savings Bank leads on 5 and Blackhawk Bank & Trust on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.