Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Blue Grass Savings Bank vs WCF Financial Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Blue Grass Savings Bank | WCF Financial Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 89 (stronger) | 23 |
| Capital cushion | 93 (stronger) | 33 |
| Loan quality | 89 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 72 (stronger) | 24 |
| Funding & liquidity | 98 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 8 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 0th |
| Total assets | $225.5M | $224.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $185.6M | $173.7M |
| Capital ratio | 14.30% (stronger) | 8.31% |
| Problem loans | 0.34% (stronger) | 5.11% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | -0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.31% (stronger) | 0.10% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 61.8% (stronger) | 100.3% |
| Uninsured deposits | 12.6% (stronger) | 23.7% |
| Offices | 2 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Blue Grass Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 23). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Blue Grass Savings Bank leads on 7 and WCF Financial Bank on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.