Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bodcaw Bank vs Bank of Little Rock
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bodcaw Bank | Bank of Little Rock |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 60 (stronger) | 56 |
| Capital cushion | 59 (stronger) | 36 |
| Loan quality | 54 | 83 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 68 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 53 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 76 | 94 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 19th | 13th |
| Total assets | $247.3M | $252.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $220.4M | $231.5M |
| Capital ratio | 10.89% (stronger) | 8.59% |
| Problem loans | 1.38% | 0.51% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 6.57% |
| Return on assets | 1.21% (stronger) | -1.25% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 92.6% | 55.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 28.6% | 14.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Bodcaw Bank has the higher TellerScore (60 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bodcaw Bank leads on 4 and Bank of Little Rock on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.