Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bodcaw Bank vs Bank of Salem
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bodcaw Bank | Bank of Salem |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 60 | 71 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 59 | 74 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 54 (stronger) | 40 |
| Earnings | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 53 | 74 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 76 | 80 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 19th | 47th |
| Total assets | $247.3M | $261.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $220.4M | $227.6M |
| Capital ratio | 10.89% | 12.43% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.38% (stronger) | 1.79% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.25% |
| Return on assets | 1.21% | 2.03% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 92.6% | 86.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 28.6% | 15.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Bank of Salem has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bodcaw Bank leads on 2 and Bank of Salem on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.