Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bristol Morgan Bank vs State Bank of Reeseville
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bristol Morgan Bank | State Bank of Reeseville |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 66 | 68 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 53 (stronger) | 46 |
| Loan quality | 86 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 56 (stronger) | 52 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 | 59 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 31st | 37th |
| Total assets | $191.2M | $169.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $157.1M | $139.6M |
| Capital ratio | 10.25% (stronger) | 9.58% |
| Problem loans | 0.43% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.02% (stronger) | 0.03% |
| Return on assets | 0.91% (stronger) | 0.79% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 97.4% | 66.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.3% (stronger) | 47.2% |
| Offices | 4 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 1.1% | — |
State Bank of Reeseville has the higher TellerScore (68 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bristol Morgan Bank leads on 4 and State Bank of Reeseville on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.