Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Bruning Bank vs Custer Federal State Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Bruning Bank | Custer Federal State Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 | 80 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 50 | 70 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 69 (stronger) | 64 |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 | 74 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 77th |
| Total assets | $659.9M | $120.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $560.4M | $95.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.01% | 11.99% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.23% (stronger) | 1.10% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 87.0% | 86.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.2% | 8.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.1% | — |
Custer Federal State Bank has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 74). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Bruning Bank leads on 1 and Custer Federal State Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Broken Bow, NE
- Kearney, NE