TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

C E S Credit Union vs Gorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union

Credit union

C E S Credit Union

Mount Vernon, Ohio · $100 million – $1 billion

91of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Gorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union

Mansfield, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

69of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureC E S Credit UnionGorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union
TellerScore91 (stronger)69
Capital cushion81 (stronger)42
Loan quality9596 (stronger)
Earnings94 (stronger)44
Funding & liquidity9293 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)98
Peer percentile96th38th
Total assets$244.3M$16.7M
Deposits / shares$210.7M$15.1M
Capital ratio13.10% (stronger)9.19%
Problem loans0.16%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.17%0.11% (stronger)
Return on assets1.84% (stronger)0.59%
Loans ÷ deposits68.3%66.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits3.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices62
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

C E S Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), C E S Credit Union leads on 3 and Gorman-Rupp & Associates Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions