Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
C E S Credit Union vs Scott Associates Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | C E S Credit Union | Scott Associates Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 91 (stronger) | 61 |
| Capital cushion | 81 (stronger) | 66 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 61 |
| Earnings | 94 (stronger) | 24 |
| Funding & liquidity | 92 (stronger) | 81 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 86 |
| Peer percentile | 96th | 23rd |
| Total assets | $244.3M | $15.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $210.7M | $13.3M |
| Capital ratio | 13.10% (stronger) | 11.57% |
| Problem loans | 0.16% (stronger) | 1.18% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.17% (stronger) | 0.18% |
| Return on assets | 1.84% (stronger) | 0.10% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 68.3% (stronger) | 79.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.0% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
C E S Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), C E S Credit Union leads on 6 and Scott Associates Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.